Comments for Unicorns in the Bible at http://baptistmuse.com , comment 1 to 7 out of 7 comments http://baptistmuse.com Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:12:17 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://baptistmuse.com/blog/king-james-bible/538-unicorns#comment-992 Hey Grau, Great comment. It really is interesting that nobody in the mainstream is out there attacking the other versions. Only the truth seems to get attacked and torn down by the world. Thanks everyone for stopping by! - Nicholas Z. Cardot Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:39:16 +0100 http://baptistmuse.com/blog/king-james-bible/538-unicorns#comment-991 "Young's 'literal' translation shows that he simply did not know what the animal in question referred to, so he merely transliterated the Hebrew word, and did not translate it at all. His version consistently reads 'the rheem.'" This is the most honest way to deal with this word, since there is no evidence that "unicorn" is correct, either. The unicorn was an unknown beast, "reem" referred to an unknown beast, therefore, as long as the word is not translated into some known beast, one unknown beast is as good as another. Translation from one language to another is tricky, at best. The French phrase that literally translates "My watch he walks," would never be translated that way into English. If it were, the trnslation would be wrong. Correctly it would be translated, "My watch is running," because that is the way the English language treats that idea. While I think "wild ox" is incorrect, any unknown beast could be used, even a made up one. - Joe Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:36:31 +0100 http://baptistmuse.com/blog/king-james-bible/538-unicorns#comment-990 This is a great example of what great lengths man will go to when trying to attack God's word. Looking for discrepencies among these verses to prove to yourself that the Bible is in error is a staggering proof of man's rejection of Christ's sacrifice. It also proves another point. God preserved his word in the King James Bible and the world knows it. Other so-called versions don't seem to be recieving the same scrutiny, do they? Men do not oppose falsehood, they only attack the truth! - Grau Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:40:19 +0100 http://baptistmuse.com/blog/king-james-bible/538-unicorns#comment-989 Scholars and people are always trying to explain away Gods Word. But they have no clue. Praise the Lord I am just a simpleton who can understand plain english... Great article... - Baptist Brethren Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:25:04 +0100 http://baptistmuse.com/blog/king-james-bible/538-unicorns#comment-988 I've read this article from Bro. Kinney before and have used what I learned from to fight for and over my sword. - Scott Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:41:13 +0100 http://baptistmuse.com/blog/king-james-bible/538-unicorns#comment-987 This is actually a great article. Just another amazing example shown through history and etymology of the extreme superiority of the King James Bible over that of the contemporary perversions. Thanks Bro. Kinney for this amazing study! - Nicholas Z. Cardot Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:10:14 +0100 http://baptistmuse.com/blog/king-james-bible/538-unicorns#comment-986 "Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do." (1st Timothy 1:4) "But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain"(Titus 3:9) - Brian & Lisa Norton Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:01:27 +0100